THE INTERNATIONAL Chamber of Shipping has announced proposals to accelerate the maritime sector’s transition to net zero by financially rewarding ships and energy producers that invest in low, or net-zero, emission fuels.
In a paper to the International Maritime Organization, ICS proposes a fund-a-reward system to catalyse the adoption of alternative fuels, which currently cost at least two or three times more than conventional marine fuel.
The ICS fund and reward proposal combines elements of various recent greenhouse gas reduction proposals from a number of governments, plus a flat rate contribution system previously proposed by ICS and Intercargo, and ideas recently put forward for a global IMO measure by the EU 27.
ICS chairman Emanuele Grimaldi said, “With the ICS fund and reward proposal, IMO member states have a new but very short window of opportunity to put in place a global economic measure which can kick start the development and production of alternative fuels for shipping. To achieve net zero mid-century, these new fuels must start to become available in significant quantities on a commercial basis no later than about 2030.
“Compromise is always difficult but, in any negotiation, having a proposal like this can enable everyone to come together. I hope this proposal will act as a bridge between the climate ambitions of both developed and developing countries so that no part of the global shipping industry will be left behind,” Mr Grimaldi said.
The reward rate would be calculated based on carbon dioxide emissions prevented and funded via a mandatory flat rate contribution from ships per tonne of carbon dioxide emitted.
ICS said the fund-and-reward system could be established by 2024, if governments can agree on the regulatory framework at the IMO.
ICS proposes that contributions from the global fleet be gathered in an “international maritime sustainability fund”.
The body said such a fund could raise billions of dollars every year. These funds would then be committed to narrowing the price gap, globally, between existing high-carbon marine fuels and alternative fuels, as well as supporting much needed investment in developing nations for the production of new marine fuels and bunkering infrastructure.
The fund would reward ships according to annual reporting of the carbon dioxide emissions prevented by the use of eligible alternative fuels.
For example, a ship powered by ammonia (among many other alternative fuels including methanol, hydrogen, sustainable biofuels and synthetic fuels) could receive a cost saving of more than US$1.5 million annually.
Coming ahead of COP 27, this new industry proposal is relevant in the context of the total carbon dioxide emissions from international shipping – regarded as a ‘hard to abate’ sector – which account for between 2 and 3 per cent of the world economy’s total greenhouse gas emissions.
ICS secretary general Guy Platten said the price gap of new, very expensive, alternative fuels must be narrowed to accelerate their production and take-up, so that a take-off point is reached by 2030 on the pathway to net-zero by 2050.
“But it is crucial that our industry also supports maritime greenhouse gas reduction efforts in developing countries,” he said.
“This fund has the potential to go beyond the traditional reach of the IMO, boosting investment for the fuel production and bunkering infrastructure in ports worldwide that will be vital for our global industry to decarbonise completely.”
The ICS proposal aims to ensure that at least 5% of the energy used by the world fleet in 2030 is produced from alternative fuels. This would deliver against Mission Innovation’s 2022 Action Plan for zero-emission shipping and would represent the equivalent of approximately 15 million tonnes of new fuels annually by the end of the decade, a significant advance from a current figure of almost zero.
A detailed impact assessment undertaken for ICS by Clarksons Research has identified that a financial contribution of up to approximately US$100 per tonne of carbon dioxide emitted would not cause disproportionately negative impacts on the economies of states. However, ICS believes that contributions could initially be set much lower and then be subject to a 5-year review as increasing quantities of new fuels become available.
